The T-56 got its start in the early 90's with the Dodge Viper and GM F-Body line. It evolved from the 5-speed T-5 as an alternative to handle higher power engines, this time as a double-overdrive 6-speed. Back then, it was manufactured by Borg-Warner, which ultimately sold off the transmission division to Tremec. In previous years, the T-56 gained popularity by finding its way to other vehicles such as the Corvette, Aston Martin Vanquish, and the Cadillac CTS-V just to name a few.
Tremec has since improved on the base model with an aftermarket Magnum version as well as a newer 6-speed known as the TR-6060 for later-model Mustangs. As for the Terminator, the one developed for use behind the supercharged engine has generally done well, but if a Magnum is on your wish-list, an informative article from Modified Mustangs magazine will fill in all the blanks.
The chart below lists the Tremec part numbers along with the accompanying information from Ford and a breakdown of the gear ratios. For whatever reason, the part numbers were changed from 2003 to 2004, but I've never been able to ascertain the differences other than being told they are "Basically the same..." by a rep at Tremec. All models of the transmission have 10-spline inputs shafts, with output shafts in 27 splines for the Terminator, and 31 splines for the Ford Racing & Cobra R versions. If you happen to get your hands on one of the latter units, a matching driveshaft yoke (not "yolk") is available from FRPP as M-4841-A.
One area generally agreed upon for "improvement", especially when power levels are greatly increased, is the aforementioned input shaft. From the factory, the 1-1/6" diameter shaft is standard (again, with 10 splines), but it has been known to twist, or even break from hard drag-race launches - if that is your thing. The standard upgrade here is a 26-spline, 1-1/8" piece that is more resistant to damage due to not only the increased spline count, but the larger diameter.
Some will also say the T-56 is a bit "notchy", but that can be considered a matter of personal preference. Interestingly enough, it uses Mercon-V Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF), which is an update from the original Mercon-III that is referenced on a label adhered to the transmission (and mentioned in the SVT Supplement). My choice, based on personal experience (as well as another conversation with a tech at Tremec) is Mobil1 ATF. Mine shifts fine with the synthetic ATF, but like so many other things, there will be plenty of different opinions here as to what is "best".
Interestingly enough, ATF has about the same viscosity as a 20-weight crankcase oil (per the SAE J300 classification), which is perfect for the fluid to flow through all the small internal passages. Many, however, have switched to a heavier "Synchromesh", or "Manual Transmission" fluid with good results. Again, personal preference. By the way, the T-56 takes 3.9 liters of fluid, which easily rounds off to 4 quarts!
If you have ever worked, or are planning to work on a T-56, help yourself to the service manual by clicking the thumbnail. If you've never dug in to a manual transmission and aren't even quite sure what is going on inside, there is an animation on YouTube that lays it out quite nicely. Also, there is plenty of other information on the internet, including links to some of the special tools that are needed to remove some of the gears, found through any number of search engines. As much as I hate to admit that anything related to GM is useful, there is a great link with pictures of a re-build that is hosted courtesy of LS2.com. Enjoy!
Note: While the differences in the transmission from '03 to '04 may not be obvious, it is important to mention that they do each have their own specific wiring harnesses which are not interchangeable. For 2003, the part number of the harness was 2R3Z-15525-DA, and for 2004, it is 4R3Z-15525-FA (the latter is still available, while the former is obsolete - no surprise). While they look similar, the position of the driver's side front oxygen sensor and both at the rear - which are part of this harness - dictate the need for a unique version for each year. I suppose it is also possible to use the '04 harness on an '03 if you add O2 sensor extenders for the rear, but I have not researched it thoroughly. In any case, the extenders are easy to come by and are inexpensive.
One of the weak links in the drivetrain has always been self-adjusting, plastic clutch quadrant that comes from the factory. Mustang owners going way back have generally replaced it with a quality aftermarket kit that is not only stronger (usually aluminum), but manually adjustable. Along with that, you have a choice of using a cable with a threaded end at the clutch fork, or to make it real easy, an adjuster at the firewall.
I originally went with a package deal through the former Fiore Performance (see thumbnail), although I am not sure if this particular kit is available any longer. The nice feature is the "micro-click" firewall adjuster that locks itself in to position without any need for a jam nut. It is definitely easy to tweak from under the hood, and had functioned perfectly up until I installed my new Centerforce clutch (see next section). For whatever reason, with the new clutch, I needed to take up just a bit more of the cable which meant the firewall adjuster would hit the cam cover (the MM kit also includes a spacer to fix this). Not to worry though, I picked up a new quadrant through Ford Racing (M-7583-A) that allowed the cable end to pull forward a bit more due to its revised outline.
Installation of these are relatively straightforward, but for a nice set of instructions that will apply to just about all of the kits, look no further than Maximum Motorsports for details on both the clutch quadrant as well as the firewall adjuster. One item worth mentioning is the alignment of the cable in the adjuster: you have to cut off the factory mounting bushing at the firewall end and replace it with a piece of 3/4" heater hose to center it in the new adjuster. The Fiore adjuster originally came with a thin piece of clear tubing for this, but it was nowhere thick enough to hold the cable straight, so I tossed it and added the short piece of heater hose (this is clearly illustrated in the MM instructions).
Also, be sure to set the tension so the throwout bearing rides lightly on the clutch diaphragm fingers, NOT floating above it! Some geniuses on various forums will tell you that a spring placed on the clutch fork under the cable end is necessary to keep the bearing lifted off the fingers, which is absolutely not the case (it does not do this from the factory). For more on it, another page on the MM site appropriately titled How to Adjust a Mustang Clutch Cable is a perfect read on the subject.
Like so many other aftermarket parts for the Mustang, there are plenty of vendors that make these kits, so it is very easy to source one that fits your needs or budget. As usual, opinions on which one is best will be all over the map. If you do desire trouble-free clutch engagement, don't hesitate to pull the weak plastic out from under the dash and make the upgrade.
Note: Do yourself a favor and stay with the OEM Ford cable. Aftermarket cables always stretch and break, but those from Ford are known to be quite durable, and better yet, smooth. You can still pick up a new one from Ford (p/n 2R3Z-7535-AA) quite inexpensively, and a spare is always a good idea. For some nice details on cables, there is a tech page, once again, on the Maximum Motorsports website that is worth
The factory clutch is pretty stout, but the extra pedal effort had never really bothered me. I've heard plenty of complaints over the years about how "stiff" it is, but in my opinion, that is the price you pay for a performance-oriented, cable-actuated clutch. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your point of view), the factory 11" Valeo clutch, that once was easily obtained through Ford Racing (M-7560-D46), has been discontinued, so aftermarket replacements have become the norm. If you really want to obtain a Valeo clutch as a replacement, their part number for the '03/'04 Cobra kit is (or was) 52802032.
Actually, it is possible to buy the factory parts through Ford (in remanufactured form), but most enthusiasts change out their clutch with one of the many sets produced by a variety of manufacturers out there such as McLeod, Spec, Fidanza, and Centerforce. My choice here since I actually am upgrading: the Centerforce Dual-Friction (DF-800075). Coincidentally, Ford Racing sells the same package under their part number M-7560-T46, although that one is meant for 26-spline input shafts.
Without making too much of a sales pitch, the thumbnail graphic from Centerforce does a great job of showing the finer points of their DF clutch line, along with the cutaway images above. It is common knowledge that as the RPM's rise, the pedal force with this clutch will decrease while the clamping force greatly increases - fine by me. Although the single-disc clutches are still "old-school" and dual-disc clutches have been gaining popularity over the years - especially as power levels have increased - I have no doubt this clutch is still a solid performer. I'll admit that some kits such as the McLeod RST and Centerforce DYAD are intriguing, but I'm still set on the DF for now.
As an update for 2016, my new Aluminator engine is done, and the DF clutch is in place and performing flawlessly. Installation was a breeze, and while I was at it, all the hardware was replaced, along with the addition of a "new" flywheel (see the note below). Keeping it simple, I also added some OEM parts, especially since they are readily available and inexpensive through Ford Racing. The pilot bearing, in roller form, is carried as M-7600-B, and the throwout bearing is M-7548-A. Also, there is a new bolt & dowel kit for the pressure plate: M-6397-A46 (the eight flywheel bolts were simply acquired through a Ford dealer). While I was back there, I also purchased a new "inspection plate", available through Ford Racing as M-7007-A, and had it powder coated to keep the rust away.
So far, the new clutch really is fantastic and the lighter pedal pressure is actually a bonus. It grabs quite well and has absolutely no chatter like so many others out there. As a slight twist, I went right out on my first drive behind the new engine and put this clutch through its paces immediately: no "granny driving" for 500 miles here (then again, no drag race launches either). Another great choice in parts for sure!
Note: Flywheel replacement is a popular option that frequently goes along with a new clutch. If you absolutely don't have to spend the money, the factory unit, formerly 2R3Z-6375-AA, can be "re-manufactured" by sending it to McLeod, where they will replace the friction insert for $125 (it is aluminum with a steel insert). If you happen to speak with a tech there, they will probably tell you they "don't recommend" resurfacing the flywheel, but I believe it will take a light cut just one time. It is, however, just as easy to have them handle the process so you can get one that is essentially new. They used to have a form right on their site for the return of your flywheel, but now there is a "Submit Return" button on the bottom of their Contact page for this.
There are probably as many opinions out there as to which shifter is "best", as there are shifters themselves, and then some. While the factory shifter fits great in the "comfort" category, it leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to precise gear engagement. A "popular" shifter on the market doesn't work for me - I hate the short handle that actually required a longer reach for first, third, and fifth gears, so I had to be different. One of the main reasons for removing the stock shifter is to "tighten" the throw, which is done by raising the pivot point - which is something all aftermarket shifters will accomplish (well, most of them anyway). My favorite for short - and crisp - shifts was the same as it has been for almost the last 20+ years: Hurst. This time, it was the T-56 version they make for Ford Racing, the M-7210-T56.
Since this is such a common modification, I didn't bother documenting the installation process, but did get some pictures of the unit before and after the project was completed. For whatever reason, the FRPP version of the shifter comes bare anodized, as shown below, rather than with the gold finish that is the norm for their "Billet Plus" line and in the FRPP stock photo (kind of cool, even though you won't actually see it!). Hurst even supplies a rubber boot, that does a perfect job of sealing up the shifter while keeping any stuff out of the top. Very nice.
The version from Ford Racing actually comes with a long chrome handle, but I had no desire to use it since its extra length did not shorten the throw (and it looks awful anyway). The perfect solution was the stock handle bolted on with stainless steel bushings (another version is also made by Steeda), which is shown above left. The ability to use the stock handle is actually one of several nice features of the Hurst, and with a throw of about 3", it is perfect. With the steel bushings in place of the factory rubber isolator, the handle is solid, and the shifts are incredibly crisp - without the ridiculous reach. Even better, I was able to make it completely stealthy by topping off the factory handle with a real 2000 Cobra R shift knob - once sold by FRPP as M-7213-F. The finished product is shown above and to the right, along with a peek at my very cool Kenwood head unit.
As for the other features I really like, there are two. The first is the composite center section, which is shown below left. With a billet aluminum base, there would be plenty of transmission noise transferred through the handle, but the composite insert completely isolates any of it. As an added bonus, the pivot of the shifter handle can be easily greased which helps keep the movement smooth and functioning like-new.
The other unique feature is the adjustable shift bias. This is accomplished by using springs on either side of the stick to force it down, which tightens the throw and contributes to the "self-centering" feature. Rather than using just two springs like other aftermarket shifters, you have the option of adding a third or fourth (a smaller spring insider the larger one). With four springs in place, the self-centering force is still there, just at a higher rate than with two. The use of three will then offset the bias to one side or the other, depending on where that spring is placed. I chose to add the third spring to the right of the stick with puts more down force on that side, thus increasing the bias in that direction (shown above, along with the trim ring and spring covers installed). This makes a shift from second-to-third, or fourth-to-fifth that much more positive rather than causing the stick to just "pop" back towards the neutral position. For any spirited driving, kiss those missed up-shifts goodbye!
Note: When it comes to replacing a shifter, there are many opinions as to the best way to seal it to the transmission. My personal preference is Permatex Ultra Copper silicone gasket maker. The stuff is indestructible and has never leaked in any application I have used it for, including several engine and transmission rebuilds over the years. While you are in the process of replacing a shifter, it's also the perfect way to fill the transmission with new fluid since you can pour it in right through the shifter opening rather than having to pump it up from below.
If you are still using the stock (and relatively thin) differential cover, aftermarket bushings and a brace are fairly common additions to stabilize the "pumpkin". Early Terminator differentials also were prone to leak thanks to the use of a generic silicone sealer combined with the movement allowed by the OEM rubber. Ford eventually figured this out and began using their "gray" high-temperature sealant (Motorcraft TA-29), but at the very least, stiffer bushings are a necessity. If you choose to pass on the brace, another fantastic option is a reinforced cover, such as the Ford Racing M-4033-G3.
I have had great luck with the Maximum Motorsports MMIRSB-45 bushing kit (made by Prothane), and for a brief period, a billet aluminum brace that was sold at one time by MotoBlue (removed due to the differential upgrade below). The MotoBlue brace is now out of production, but other versions in steel are still available through Steeda or Billetflow. The brace itself bolts right over the STOCK cover to provide more support, and the bushings obviously replace the factory pieces, both front AND rear.
There are also a couple other points to consider when replacing your differential bushings. First, as previously mentioned, replace them as a complete set. There is no sense in just putting new bushings in the front and leaving the factory bushing in the rear bracket (or vice versa), unless of course you are just still using OEM rubber. Second, the Prothane kit uses front bushings with a thicker lower half, so they raise the front of the differential slightly to adjust the pinion angle. The other polyurethane kit by Energy Suspension uses symmetrical bushings like the original rubber and won't give you that benefit. It's still not as precise as measuring and shimming, but it works nonetheless.
Despite what "poly-haters" will say, the MM/Prothane bushings are quite solid and hold the differential firmly in place. Those same haters have also been known to complain about the bushings melting, while placing the blame on the material, rather than focusing on the underlying mechanical issues. Adding to that, they'll claim this is evidence of the "inferiority" of polyurethane while spouting off about how great something like Delrin is instead. If you are running your car so hard that the differential is getting hot enough to melt the bushings (and most likely the seals as well), you are going to have problems with rubber, polyurethane, or yes, even Delrin. More details about bushing hardness is on my Suspension page and included in the chart below.
If an even harder material, such as aluminum, is your thing, then more power to you, but be aware the Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH) levels will go up since you now essentially have a solid mount. For a street-driven car, the polyurethane is perfect, but if you have to go with the "solid" mount, there are options. Other kits that come to mind are made by Maximum Motorsports as well as the former Drop Engineering (if you can find them). The MM kit is all aluminum and will offer the greatest resistance to heat, whereas the DE kit used aluminum up front and Delrin in the back. From what I understand, Drop Engineering is (or was) a "development partner" of Mishimoto, and their kits were also sold by American Muscle.
With both of them, the bushings can be shimmed to account for variations in driveshaft pinion angle (also somewhat built in with the thicker lower half of the Prothane bushings), but the nice feature of the MM kit is the concave washers. These washers will allow the differential to pivot and accommodate for changes in the pinion angle while not placing any stress on the forward mounting tabs. For a complete run-down of it, download their installation instructions. Additionally, if you choose to add the Ford Racing differential cover (see the next section), a custom milled version is available that will allow use of the heavy-duty aluminum mounts.
Whatever road you take, any increase in differential mounting stiffness will go a long way towards prolonging the life of your rear end. My choice of polyurethane has left me with no regrets at all, especially since the housing does not budge one bit. Even better, there is absolutely no NVH increase that would be present with the other kits.
Note: Terminator owners lucked out when it came to the front differential support. The improved version of this brace for 2003 added two mounting ears that also sandwiched the forward bushings from beneath the differential, rather than just above as part of the IRS cradle. Fortunately, earlier Cobra owners (including those with a 2000 R) used to be able to find this as Ford Racing M-5030-F, but like so many other parts, it is gone from production. They are still floating around the used market, but as alternative, there is a seriously heavy-duty aftermarket version still made by Kenny Brown that is a good choice.
The factory traction-lok differential isn't all that bad, but it does have two shortcomings. First, the friction discs wear and eventually will cause the differential to slip. Fortunately, there is a Cobra-specific kit available through Ford Racing as M-4700-C when it is time for a re-build. The second is that when driven relatively hard, they simply get hot - thanks to the friction in those discs (it's not the fault of the bushings - get a clue!). Most drivers, however, are going to do just fine with the OEM differential, but I like to tinker and wanted to make an upgrade here to a stronger "torque multiplying" differential.
My choice here is a Torsen (short for "Torque Sensing") T-2R "Racemaster". It is actually standard on the Mustang FR-500S race car, and also sold through Ford Racing as M-4204-T31H, or as the Torsen 975420-0200L. These differentials have the advantage of running cooler, with no friction discs to wear out, which essentially makes them good for life. Adding to that, they do a much better job of instantly distributing wheel torque, while also functioning as an "open" differential during normal straight-line driving. For the basics, Torsen has a nice summary sheet, and I'll give the guys at Maximum Motorsports more credit for having a Torsen page on their site that also has more information.
It is worth mentioning that there are two Torsen models available for the 8.8 rear: the T-2R & the T-2. They differ in the level they distribute torque, known as the "Torque Bias Ratio", or TBR. In simplest terms, the TBR tells you how much torque would be multiplied out to the axle that has more traction (i.e., the one that is spinning slower). The T-2R has a TBR of 4.0 which means it puts four times more power to the wheel that has the grip, compared to 2.5 for the T-2. A limited slip differential will also do essentially the same thing, but with the Torsen, you are getting an instant power transfer by way of the cooler running gears rather than the friction plates.
Along the lines of the TBR, there is one more point to consider. Since the Torsen differential is a torque multiplier, some resistance in the gearing is necessary to make this happen. If a wheel becomes airborne, it then loses any of that resistance and the TBR will essentially be zero for that wheel. This is actually the case for the T-2, but to combat the issue, Torsen developed the T-2R.
Note: Ford Racing states their T31H is not compatible with IRS housings for some reason. There is only one T-2R for the Ford 8.8" differential, which mates to both independent and solid rear ends (there is also a 28-spline version available under a different part number). This was also confirmed through conversations with the guys at both Torsen as well as MM, but I do not know why Ford Racing adds that stipulation since plenty of us use them with great results.
There is some information on the Torsen web site, but unfortunately, it is a bit lacking when it comes to the internals of the T-2R (well, other than the two pictures above). It consists, again, entirely of planetary gears, which are also illustrated clearly on the old T-2 data sheet. The thumbnail also shows an exploded view of another torque biasing differential, the Eaton Detroit True-Trac, which is similar to the T-2, but with a TBR of approximately 3.5. There is also a neat YouTube animation video of the True-Trac that is worth watching, along with a handful of others that can be found elsewhere on the web. Interestingly enough, Eaton markets the True-Trac as perfectly suited for drag racing, whereas Torsen and Ford Racing do not recommend it for the T-2 or T-2R. Since I have no interest in drag racing, that is not an issue.
With a new differential, complete with a Ford Racing rear cover (thus, the removal of the brace), I couldn't resist making a change to the gearing. I had hoped at one time to get my hands on a '00R T-56, but since that has yet to happen, I decided a 3.73 ring and pinion (3:55 is stock) was a perfect match to the 2.66 first gear in the Terminators T-56. The additional torque multiplication with the new gear ratio will suit the taller first gear just fine, but for a graphic showing the mechanical advantage of a few different gear combinations, click the thumbnail. Also, don't forget that with the new gear, you'll have to use a hand-held tuner to change the ratio or your speedometer will be incorrect.
To make this project a bit easier, I decided to pick up a spare IRS housing and essentially build it from scratch rather than pull apart the factory differential (truth be told, I had a pro build it for me - this was one area I didn't want to skimp). Fortunately, a call to Tousley Ford made it easy to get my hands on all the additional parts through Ford Racing at a great price. For a complete list of what else I acquired, see the chart below.
Note: One last minor bonus of the Torsen diff is its weight. It is actually about five pounds heavier than the OEM limited-slip unit (25 vs. 20), which is fine by me. Normally, any weight added is a bad thing, but it doesn't hurt to shift some weight towards the rear, especially on a nose-heavy Terminator. If you are even more adventurous, an iron housing from a Thunderbird Turbo Coupe is also an option (just like Ford also did with the 2015 Mustang GT). Additionally, I dug the factory vibration damper back out to check it - almost another ten pounds there (if you are still able to use it). It's incredibly trivial, but every little bit helps when it comes to balance.